Qin Hui Formation and Future of China's miracle

 Qin Hui: Future South Weekend   The results, also in the specific historical conditions under the constraints of trial and error, there is no precedent to follow. In the context of globalization, the world dazzling to the a long history of reform and opening up grand opera is the occasion of the opening, no doubt, we need a big 30 years on the reform discussion. concluded three decades and reflect three years, get rid of historical burdens, and create a new Bureau of reform, this is the reform the best opening mark three decades, the best inheritance, the new moment in the history of our most important mission. For this reason, special newspaper article sent Professor Qin Hui, and published this article after another, and strive for Three years of reform and opening up the historical experience and lessons learned, make an instructive interpretation and summary, to satisfy the interest in the Chinese way, China to the readers, please your attention. If there is a process everyone suffer, but How many suffer, but the basic no benefit, we can say that this is a , ... ... former planned economies of Eastern Europe to run a relatively successful, which makes the transition to become second wave of reform began,UGG boots cheap, China's reform experience ... ... when it comes to that: the existing system ;. just more than ten years, the Chinese-made goods flood the world as full around the world flood into China's capital. China has become the people become increasingly self-confidence. If the TV political commentator in 1989 film fifteen years after China's progress is great. But on the other hand, the problems that have accumulated as much as fifteen years can not be ignored. fifteen years, China's iron-fisted regime with lower , to avoid some democratic countries in transition struggling to cope with frequent game at all levels of the promotion; the other hand, all the modern welfare state also made progress in speeding up construction of public services in China. can be said that the civilized world, liberalism and socialism (not Stalinist) are there for us in the promotion of globalization, which is We support the cause of reform and opening up. the international scholars of the so-called transition economies, and the parties seem to have formed a show a large effect; and China's the . Obviously, this argument contains some common underlying premise that China's radical Since that is the Social ... ... power, is the world's welfare state typical of Eastern European countries in the accession negotiations not to mention: I am afraid that no one can prove that today's China than in Eastern Europe is more like 2003, 1, 4-5) ; countries,cheap UGG boots, the difference between the transition of poor economic policy is difficult to use the ; Eastern Europe, or short recession. then they have almost all (except a few occur outside the war-torn countries) restored the strong or weak economic growth, but China's continued economic growth in 30 years seems to have significantly less than. no matter how many water, since the reform of the Chinese economy in terms of its growth, is indeed a a positive experience. Indeed, after the analysis in the perspective that some of the mistakes in the Eastern European countries is not difficult, but since either radical or gradual, engage not to engage in so-called shock therapy, the ruling left-wing or right wing in power, have experienced depression, throughout Central and Eastern Europe from Belarus to Estonia (not to mention from Turkmenistan to the former East Germany) have appeared in recession, they have not experienced this with the decline of the comparison between China, it is difficult to wrong sort of argument to explain.  double on the articles and the efficiency gains out of the argument counting from the Third Plenum in 1978, has experienced for 30 years. but ... ... There was a saying: In fact, the . two years are out, out of the Chinese real out '... ...' period was denounced as confusion in the signs of the spontaneous emergence of the market, then are used as ; they must not only get rid of the decade 1966-1976, as described by Bo Yibo's memoirs, in fact, negative in 1956 of a long system, the implementation of Lands Zhichang, the China will not work out. Although the pre-reform China and the Soviet Union have a similar ideology, its institutions, especially the economic system is quite different. In industry, this distinction in 1956, criticism of China, to the age of the Great Leap Forward and the until the later long-term, comprehensive That is almost the economics . when the economy was on the dictatorship just want a little more rational planned economy, less Taihongtaiweng. But in those years in the latter advantage is the mainstream. According to the memory of Bo Yibo, in the 30 years before the reform, in addition to previous 1956 local ( such as the Northeast) have more reason planned components ,1962-19 ... ... years have weaker : farmers countries result of the revolution occurred, with Hicks as the era before the market's traditional civilization, Tai Hing Brezhnev era mathematical economics, emphasizing the elements of configuration optimization model, and gradually developed a H-type big hum of the peasant war result in this direction is no longer room for development, but will have to find another way to pay disrupt the original Steel Constitution accounting; until the pre-reform China is still only know that The hill economy and . Of course, another static ; although it can be very physical indicators of then said: planned economy ignore the case of personal preference, trends, at this point Economics industrial primitive accumulation (non-rational command economy can not do even that), but sooner or later will face changes. and once change, the more large. This consideration includes collapse. Moreover, the size of these costs and the power or right, power, etc. vary widely, but the early transition, without exception, have suffered varying degrees of economic recession. and poor, low utility gain and the optimization to give up these strict - The most obvious is: do not even facing the transition of Finland, just because of her large proportion of trade with CMEA countries, but also the waste involved in the rational scheme, in 1989, after several years of economic Landslide .1991-1994, the Finnish gross national product fell from $ 122,000,000,000 $ 95,800,000,000, a drop of 21.5%.